(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.) |
1) [line 1] KAL VA'CHOMER L'SHABBOS - and all the more so (that the words of a Shechiv Mera are binding) on Shabbos (since we are worried that the prohibition to record his instructions or to make an irrevocably-binding acquisition may cause his condition to worsen) 2) [line 2] ZACHIN L'GADOL - an unappointed agent can make an acquisition on the behalf of an adult (see Background to Bava Metzia 10:6), since he has a "Yad" (lit. a hand) with which to make acquisitions, and they are binding even if he does not use his own Yad (RABEINU GERSHOM) 3) [line 3] KAL VA'CHOMER L'KATAN - all the more so for a minor (an unappointed agent can make an acquisition on his behalf), since he does not have a Yad of his own (RABEINU GERSHOM) 4) [line 11] MORISHAV - a person's relatives whose estates he is in line to inherit
5a) [line 11] HAYESAH ALAV KESUVAS ISHAH - it was [incumbent] upon him (i.e.
his estate) [to pay the value of] the Kesuvah of his wife 6) [line 15] NECHASIM B'CHEZKASAN - those items of the father's estate stay in the possession of his heirs who have legal rights to them (and we do not consider that the son inherited them before his death)
7a) [line 17] NECHASIM MESHU'ABADIM - property that can have a lien on it,
such that a creditor can collect the money owed to him by taking the
property from the debtor or from those who bought the property from the
debtor 8) [line 18] "D'IKNI" V'KANAH - if someone says that he will repay his creditor even with the items *that he will buy in the future* and he buys items
9) [line 19] ADAM MAKNEH DAVAR SHE'LO VA LA'OLAM 10) [line 23] ZEH HAYAH PIKE'ACH SHE'MACHAR LO ES HA'KARKA MIPENEI SHE'HU YACHOL L'MASHKENO ALAV - this one (the creditor) was clever by selling him (his debtor) the land, since he is (now) able to take it as security. The Tana'im argue (Kesuvos 110a) about a case where a creditor demands repayment of a loan that the debtor claims to have repaid. As evidence, the debtor produces a bill of sale of land that that he bought from the creditor, in which the sale date is later that the date of the loan. The debtor claims that the creditor would never have sold him land while the loan was outstanding. Admon accepts the claim of the debtor, and absolves him of his obligation to repay the loan. The Chachamim reject the claim, defending the clever creditor who devised a plan to ensure that the debtor would possess land that he could later collect as security for the loan. 11) [line 25] "MINEI" KA'AMAR? - Did he (the debtor) say "From him[self]?" (i.e. when he specified "d'Ikni" for the repayment of the loan) 12) [line 26] MINEI, AFILU MI'GELIMA D'AL KASPEI! - [the debtor must repay the loan] from him (the debtor himself), and even if he has to take the shirt off of his back! 13) [line 27] "D'IKNI," KANAH U'MACHAR; "D'IKNI," KANAH V'HORISH - if someone says that he will pay his creditor even with the items *that he will buy in the future* and he buys items and sells them, or he buys items, dies and leaves them to his heirs 14) [line 33] LO MISHTA'ABED - they do *not* become Meshu'abad to his creditor, i.e. his stipulation does not work because "d'Ikni" is not Mesha'abed the possessions
15) [line 34] D'IKNI HU! - it is a case of "d'Ikni" (see above, entries #8,
13) 17) [line 36] MITZVAH AL HA'YESOMIM LIFRO'A CHOVAS AVIHEN - It is a Mitzvah for orphans to repay the debts of their father. Orphans do not have to repay the debts of their father with Metaltelin (moveable goods) if the father did not leave them any land. If the loan was not recorded in a document (see next entry), then some maintain that the children do not have to repay the loan even if the father did leave them land. In all circumstances, it is a Mitzvah for them to do so, similar to the concept of Mitzvah l'Kayem Divrei ha'Mes (see Background to Gitin 40:4). (However, once the Gemara relegates their obligation to pay to a Mitzvah, it is no longer dependent upon whether "d'Iknei" was written in the Shtar. As such, it is equivalent to a loan that was made without a Shtar, as Rav Ashi proceeds to challenge.)
18) [line 37] [IM KEN,] MILVEH AL PEH HU! - [If so (this is the Girsa of the
RASHBAM),] this is [equivalent to] a loan that was not recorded in a Shtar
(a legal document)! (MILVEH BI'SHTAR / MILVEH AL PEH)
19) [line 2] NEHAR PEKOD - a town in Bavel on the Pekod River 21) [line 4] HA'ME'UCHARIN - post-dated (these documents are valid because the problem mentioned in the previous entry does not exist with regard to post-dated documents) 22) [line 9] L'SHEVACH KARKA'OS KEITZAD? - how [does a person who purchased a field and spent his resources to improve the field get compensation] for the improvement of the land (after the field is repossessed by the seller's creditor)?
23) [line 11] TARFAH - repossessed it 26) [line 19] LAVAH V'LAVAH V'CHAZAR V'KANAH - one who took a loan [and wrote "d'Ikni," that he will repay his creditor even with the properties that he will buy in the future] and then he took another loan [from a different creditor and he wrote that he will repay the second creditor even with the properties that he will buy in the future] and he buys properties
27a) [line 20] L'KAMA MISHTA'ABED - the properties are Meshu'abad to the
first creditor's loan (since his loan was first) 28) [line 22] SHALCHU MI'TAM - the Chachamim sent [a teaching] from there (from Eretz Yisrael to Bavel)
29a) [line 24] MAHADURA KAMA D'RAV ASHI - (a) the first time that Rav Ashi
taught this Halachah (RAV HAI GA'ON); (b) within the first thirty years of
Rav Ashi's life. Rav Ashi lived for sixty years and completed learning all
of the Torah that he was physically able to learn when he was thirty years
old. He spent the next thirty years reviewing his Tporah learning (RABEINU
CHANANEL) 30) [line 30] V'IM ISA, CHATZI SHEVACH MIBA'I LEI - and if this assertion is true (that the Halachah is "Yachloku"), the Beraisa should have stated that he collects *half* of the value of the improvements
|