(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


THOUGHTS ON THE DAILY DAF

brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Har Nof
Rosh Kollel: Rav Mordecai Kornfeld


Ask A Question about the Daf

Previous daf

Bava Basra, 166

1) THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF "COINS" OF DIFFERENT DENOMINATIONS

QUESTION: The Beraisa teaches that when a Shtar mentions that a person borrowed "gold Dinarin" but it does not mention the number of Dinarin, the creditor may claim only two gold Dinarin, since the minimum possible amount to which the plural "Dinarin" refers is two -- "Mi'ut Rabim Shenayim." The Beraisa earlier (165b) teaches the same with regard to a Shtar that says "silver Dinarin." Similarly, the Mishnah (165b) states that when a Shtar mentions that a person borrowed "Zuzin," "Sela'in," or "Darkonos," and the number of those coins was erased, the creditor may claim only two, which is the minimum possible amount of the plural word used in the Shtar.

Why do the Mishnah and Beraisa need to repeat itself with regard to these different types of coins? The Mishnah and Beraisa need only teach this in one case, and then we would know that whenever there is an unspecified amount of "coins" (in the plural) -- regardless of what type of coin -- the creditor may collect only two! (TORAS CHAIM, TOSFOS YOM TOV; see SHINUY NUSCHA'OS in the Mishnayos, and DIKDUKEI SOFRIM #7.)

ANSWERS:

(a) The PNEI SHLOMO answers that the Mishnah (and Beraisa) is teaching a Chidush in each case. Since the subject of the Shtar is coins, which are divisible entities, we might have thought that even though the word used is plural, it refers not to two coins but to one and a half coins. The Mishnah is teaching that the creditor is entitled to more than one and a half coins -- he is entitled to take two full coins of the specified denomination, because if it is true that the borrower only borrowed one and a half coins (such as a Sela and half a Sela), then the value of the half-coin would have been expressed in terms of a smaller denomination (a Sela and two Dinarin).

The Pnei Shlomo adds that this is also why the Mishnah and Beraisa use the phrase, "It is not less than two...," instead of saying, "He may only collect two." "It is not less than two" excludes a *lesser* amount, and implies that we might have thought that the creditor is only allowed to collect an amount which is less than two (such as one and a half). "He may only collect two" excludes a *greater* amount, and implies that we might have thought that the creditor should collect more than two. Since the Mishnah is teaching that he *may* collect more than just one and a half, it says, "It is not less than two."

The Mishnah and Beraisa, therefore, needed to teach this Chidush with regard to each denomination of coins, since we would not have been able to learn one from the other. People might write "one and a half Zuzin" without expressing the fractional Zuz in terms of a smaller denomination. Therefore, the Mishnah must teach us in each case that the plural word is not less than two.

(b) The TIFERES YISRAEL explains that each case in the Mishnah is necessary for the following reasons. In the case of "Kesef Zuzin which are...," where the number of Zuzin was erased, we might have thought that the creditor is entitled to collect four Zuzin, since the words "Kesef Zuzin which are..." imply that the author of the Shtar is defining an equal value for "Kesef Zuzin." The lowest number of Zuzin which are equivalent to a different coin is four, and the Shtar originally said, "Kesef Zuzin which are one Sela." Therefore, the Mishnah needs to teach us that the creditor may only collect two Zuzin, because perhaps the author of the Shtar was giving a number of Zuzin, and not an equivalent value in another denomination.

In the case of "Kesef Sela'in which are...," where the number of Sela'in was erased, we might have thought that the author of the Shtar was referring to two *inferior* Sela'in (as mentioned earlier in the Mishnah), which are equal to seven Zuzin (or 6 2/3 Zuzin), and not 8 Zuzin, and the Shtar originally read, "Kesef Sela'in which are seven Zuzin." Therefore, the Mishnah teaches that the creditor may collect two standard Sela'in and not inferior ones.

In the case of "Kesef Darkonos which are...," where the number of Darkonos was erased, we might have thought that certainly the author of the Shtar was referring to inferior Darkonos, for the following reason. A Darkon is a large, valuable gold coin, and people do not usually pay back debts with such coins. Accordingly, we might have thought that the author of the Shtar meant inferior gold Darkonos, and that is why he was writing the actual value of the Darkonos, which was *less* than the value of two standard Darkonos. Therefore, the Mishnah needs to teach us that the creditor is indeed entitled to collect two normal Darkonos and not inferior ones.


166b

Next daf

Index


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,
daf@shemayisrael.co.il