(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


POINT BY POINT SUMMARY

Prepared by Rabbi P. Feldman
of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld


Ask A Question on the daf

Previous daf

Bava Basra 92

BAVA BASRA 91-95 - Sponsored by a generous grant from an anonymous donor. Kollel Iyun Hadaf is indebted to him for his encouragement and support and prays that Hashem will repay him in kind.

***** PEREK HA'MOCHER PEIROS ****

1) FOLLOWING THE ROV IN MONETARY MATTERS

(a) (Mishnah): Reuven bought Shimon's fruit and planted it, and it did not grow, even flax seeds - Shimon is exempt;
(b) R. Shimon ben Gamliel says, if he bought seeds that are not (normally) eaten, Shimon is liable.
(c) Reuven sold an ox to Shimon; it was found to be a gorer.
1. (Rav): The sale is mistaken (and therefore void).
2. (Shmuel): Reuven can say, I sold it to you to slaughter (the sale is valid).
3. Question: Let us see if Shimon buys oxen for plowing or for slaughter!
4. Answer: The case is, he buys for both.
5. Question: Let us see if he paid the price of a plowing ox or an ox for slaughter!
6. Answer: The case is, the price is the same for both.
7. Question: If so, what difference does it make if the sale is valid or not?
8. Answer: Whether or not Shimon must toil to sell it, or if he can demand that Reuven refund the money.
92b---------------------------------------92b

9. Question: If Reuven has nothing else to give Shimon in place of the money he owes, he may give him the ox!
10. Answer: The case is, Reuven has other money.
i. Rav says the sale is mistaken - we go after the Rov, most people buy oxen for plowing;
ii. Shmuel says he can say, I sold it to you to slaughter - we only go after the Rov in prohibitions, not in monetary matters.
(d) Question (against Rav - Mishnah):Leah was widowed or divorced; she claims that she was a Besulah when she married Reuven, (so her Kesuvah is 200 Zuz), he (or his heirs) claim that she was not (so her Kesuvah is 100):
1. If witnesses testify that she had a Hinuma (a canopy of myrtle, or a veil over her eyes), or her hair was uncovered (the custom of Besulah brides) she collects 200.
2. Inference: If she does not have witnesses, she only gets 100.
3. Summation of question: Why don't we follow the Rov, most women are Besulahs when married?!
(e) Answer (Ravina): Most women are Besulahs when married, a minority are not; every Besulah that gets married has a Kol (people remember it);
1. Since Leah has no Kol, this weakens the Rov (we do not follow it).
(f) Objection: If every Besulah has a Kol, and Leah has no Kol, we should not believe witnesses, surely they are lying!
(g) Correction: Rather, most Besulahs that get married have a Kol; since Leah has no Kol, this weakens the Rov.
(h) Question (Beraisa): If Levi sold a slave to Yehudah, and the slave was found to be a thief or Kuvyustus (Tosfos - diceplayer; Rashi - kidnapper), the sale stands;
1. If he was found to be an armed robber or sentenced (by the kingdom) to die, the sale is invalid;
2. Suggestion: In the first clause, the sale stands because most slaves are thieves or Kuvyustus (which proves that we follow Rov with regard to monetary matters).
(i) Answer: No, all slaves are.
Next daf

Index


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,
daf@shemayisrael.co.il