(Permission is granted to redistribute this material as long as the Kollel
header and the subscription info at the end are included.)

_________________________________________________________________
CHARTS FOR LEARNING THE DAILY DAF

brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Har Nof
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Email - daf@shemayisrael.co.il
_________________________________________________________________

Kidushin Chart #8a

Kidushin Daf 34a-35a

MITZVOS ASEH SHEHA'ZEMAN GERAMA IN WHICH WOMEN ARE OBLIGATED, AND THOSE FROM WHICH WOMEN ARE EXEMPT
  (A)
ARE THEY OBLIGATED?
(B)
WHAT IS THE SOURCE?
(C)
IS THIS SOURCE VERSE EXTRA?(1)
1) RE'IYAH No Zechurcha
(Shemos 23:17)
No(2)
2) SUKAH No ha'Ezrach
(Vayikra 23:42)
No(3)
3) TEFILIN(6) No Hekesh to Limud Torah
(Devarim 6:7-8)
No(4)
4) MATZAH ON PESACH NIGHT Yes Hekesh to Chametz
(Devarim 16:3)
No(5)
5) SIMCHAH ON THE FESTIVAL Yes(7) u'Vitecha...
v'ha'Almanah
(Devarim 16:14)
Yes
6) HAKHEL Yes ha'Nashim v'ha'Taf
(Devarim 31:12)
Yes
7) (KIDUSH HA'YOM ON SHABBOS)(8) Yes Zachor v'Shamor
(Shemos 20:8,
Devarim 5:12)
Yes
8) (TOSEFES INUY ON YOM KIPUR)(9) Yes ha'Ezrach
(Vayikra 16:19)
---(10)
==========
FOOTNOTES:
==========
(1) That is, is the verse considered one of two verses that teach the same thing (Shnei Kesuvim ha'Ba'im k'Echad) when we have already learned from a different source that a woman is obligated (or exempt) from this type of Mitzvah?
(2) We might have thought that a woman is obligated, since a Hekesh compares this Mitzvah with the Mitzvah of Hakhel.
(3) We might have thought that a woman is obligated, since a Hekesh compares this Mitzvah with the Mitzvah of Matzah on Pesach night.
(4) We might have thought that a woman is obligated, since a Hekesh compares this Mitzvah with the Mitzvah of Mezuzah.
(5) We might have thought that a woman is exempt, since a Hekesh compares this Mitzvah with the Mitzvah of Sukah.
(6) That is, according to the view that holds that Tefilin are not worn on Shabbos or at night, and therefore it is a Mitzvah that depends on a specific time.
(7) That is, according to Rebbi Yehudah (as Rashi writes on 35a, DH d'Havi Simchah). According to the other Tana'im, though, Abaye has already explained (34b) that women themselves are not obligated in the Mitzvah of Simchah, but rather their husbands are obligated to make them rejoice.
(8) So points out Tosfos (35a, DH Mishum).
(9) So writes the Gemara in Sukah (28a).
(10) Apparently, this verse is indeed extra (if we learn that women are *obligated* in Mitzvos Aseh sheha'Zeman Gerama from a different verse), and therefore it is difficult to understand why Tosfos (footnote #8) does not mention it. Perhaps the reason is because Tosefes Inuy of Yom Kipur is excluded from the punishment of Kares and from being a Lo Ta'aseh, and thus we might have thought that it is a more lenient prohibition, and women are exempt from it even if they are obligated in all other Mitzvos Aseh sheha'Zeman Gerama. (See Sukah 28b, and Teshuvos Rebbi Akiva Eiger 3:80, v'Tzarich Iyun.)


Main
Kidushin Page
List of Charts
and Graphics
Insights
to the Daf
Background
to the Daf
Review the Daf
Questions and Answers
Point by Point
Summary


For questions or sponsorship information, write to daf@shemayisrael.co.il