Ask A Question on the daf

Previous daf

1) EXTRA SACRIFICES

(a) Question: Money for the sin-offering is mixed in (how can all the money be used for burnt-offerings)?!
(b) Answer #1 (R. Yochanan): This law is a tradition from Moshe from Mount Sinai regarding a Nazir.
(c) Answer #2 (Reish Lakish): "For all their Nedarim (commitments to bring a sacrifice) and Nedavos (animals declared to be sacrifices)" - the Torah said that the surplus of Nedarim should be Nedavah.

1. We understand, according to R. Yochanan, the tradition only applies to unspecified money.

(d) Question: According to Reish Lakish, the verse should apply even to specified money!
(e) Answer (Rava): From Tana d'Vei R. Yishmael, we see that it does not apply to specified money.

1. (Beraisa - Tana d'Vei R. Yishmael): "Only your sacrifices that will be to you and your Nedarim" - the verse speaks of the offspring of sacrifices and Temurah (an animal onto which one wanted to transfer the Kedushah of a sacrifice).
2. The Torah commands "You will bring them to (the Temple)".
3. Suggestion: Perhaps we bring them to the Temple, and deny them food and water, so they will die!
4. Rejection: "You will offer your burnt-offerings, the flesh and the blood" - this teaches, we treat Temurah of a burnt-offering as a burnt-offering; the child of a Shelamim as a Shelamim.
5. Suggestion: Perhaps the child of a sin-offering and Temurah of a guilt-offering are likewise as a sin-offering and guilt-offering!
6. Rejection: "Only (burnt-offerings and Shelamim)".
7. (R. Akiva): You do not need to expound "Only" - we learn from "It is a guilt-offering" - it retains its status.

(a) (Beraisa) One might have thought, we bring them to the Temple, and deny them food and water, so they will die - the Torah says, "You will offer your burnt-offerings".
(b) Question: Why would one think they must die - such a tradition from Moshe from Sinai only applies to sin-offerings!
(c) Answer: If not for the verse, one might have thought that children of sin-offerings can die where they are, but children of other sacrifices must be brought to the Temple to die.

1. We hear, this is not so.

(d) (Beraisa): One might have thought that the child of a sin-offering and Temurah of a guilt-offering are likewise as a sin-offering and guilt-offering - the Torah says, "Only (burnt-offerings and Shelamim)".
(e) Question: Why is a verse needed - a tradition from Moshe from Sinai teaches that the child of a sin-offering must die!
(f) Answer: Indeed, the verse is only needed to teach about the guilt-offering.
(g) Question: (The verse is not needed) - there is also a tradition from Moshe from Sinai regarding guilt-offerings - any case where a sin-offering would die, a guilt-offering grazes (and when it gets a blemished, it is sold, and the money is used for Nedavah)!
(h) Answer: If we only had the tradition, one might have thought that it should not be offered, but one who offered it is not liable.
(i) The verse teaches that one who offers it transgresses a Chaivei Ase.
(j) (Mishnah - R. Akiva): You need not expound "Only" - another verse says "It is a guilt-offering" - it retains its status.
(k) Question: The verse is not needed - there is a tradition from Moshe from Sinai - any case where a sin-offering would die, a guilt-offering grazes!
(l) Answer: Yes, the verse ("It is a guilt-offering") is not needed to teach that it grazes; rather, it teaches Rav's law.

1. (Rav): A guilt-offering that was set aside to graze and was slaughtered to be a burnt-offering is Kosher.
2. If it was not set aside, it is not Kosher - the verse says "It is", it retains its status.