(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


POINT BY POINT SUMMARY

Prepared by Rabbi P. Feldman
of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld


Ask A Question on the daf

Previous daf

Nazir 59

1) SHAVING THE UNDERARMS AND THE GENITALS

(a) Version #2 (R. Chiya bar Aba): One who shaves his underarms or his genitals is lashed, for it says "A man will not wear the garment of a woman".
(b) Question (Beraisa): Removing hair (in these areas) is only forbidden mid'Rabanan.
(c) Answer: R. Chiya bar Aba holds as the following Tana.
1. (Beraisa): One who shaves his underarms or his genitals transgresses "A man will not wear the garment of a woman".
(d) Question: The Tana that says that the prohibition is only mid'Rabanan - how does he expound "A man will not wear the garment of a woman"?
1. Answer (Beraisa): "The garment of a man will not be on a woman" - what does this teach?
i. Suggestion: If that a man should not wear a woman's garment or vice-versa - but the Torah called this an abomination (and this is not an abomination)!
2. Answer: Rather, a man should not wear a woman's garment and sit among women, or vice-versa;
3. R. Eliezer ben Yakov says, "The garment of a man will not be on a woman" - this teaches that a woman may not bear weapons in war;
4. "A man will not wear the garment of a woman" - this teaches that a man may not adorn himself as a woman does.
(e) (Rav Nachman): A Nazir may shave the underarms and genital area.
1. The law is not as Rav Nachman.
(f) Question (Chachamim): We saw, R. Yochanan does not have hair there!
(g) Answer (R. Shemen bar Aba): It fell out due to old age.
(h) R. Ami sentenced a man to be lashed. His underarms were exposed, and R. Ami saw that he did not shave there.
1. R. Ami: Do not lash him - he is a Chacham.
(i) Question (Rav): May one shave there?
(j) Answer (R. Chiya): No.
(k) Objection (Rav): But the hair will grow to annoy him - he is not shaving for adornment!
(l) Answer (R. Chiya): No - when the hair gets too long, it falls out.
(m) Question (Rav): May one scratch there so the hair will fall out?
(n) Answer (R. Chiya): No.
(o) Version #1 Question (Rav): May one scratch through a garment?
(p) Answer (R. Chiya): Yes.
(q) Version #2 Question (Rav): May one scratch through a garment during prayer (to remove a louse)?
(r) Answer (R. Chiya): No.
1. The law does not follow the opinion of R. Chiya.
59b---------------------------------------59b

2) A DOUBTFULLY TAMEI NAZIR

(a) (Mishnah): 1 of 2 Nezirim became Tamei (we do not know which); 1 of them died. R. Yehoshua says, the survivor should find someone willing to accept Nezirus on condition.
1. The Nazir says: 'If I am Tamei, you are a Nazir starting now; if I am Tahor, you will be a Nazir after 30 days.
2. They keep 30 days of Nezirus. They bring (together) sacrifices of a Tamei Nazir and the sacrifices of a Tahor Nazir. The original Nazir stipulates: if I was Tamei, the sacrifices of a Tamei Nazir are for me, the sacrifices of a Tahor Nazir are for you; if I was Tahor, the sacrifices of a Tahor Nazir are for me, the sacrifices of a Tamei Nazir were brought because of the doubt.
3. They keep another 30 days of Nezirus. They bring (together) the sacrifices of a Tahor Nazir. The original Nazir stipulates: if I was Tamei, these sacrifices are for me; if I was Tahor, these sacrifices are for you.
(b) Ben Zoma says, who will consent to accept Nezirus on such conditions?!
1. Rather, the surviving Nazir brings (after 30 days) a bird as a sin-offering and an animal as a burnt-offering. He stipulates: if I was Tamei, I fulfill my obligation with the sin-offering, and the burnt-offering is a voluntary sacrifice; if I was Tahor, I fulfill my obligation with the burnt-offering, and the sin-offering was brought because of the doubt.
2. He keeps another 30 days of Nezirus and brings the sacrifices of a Tahor Nazir. He stipulates: if I was Tamei, I fulfill my current obligation (of a Tahor Nazir) with these sacrifices;
3. If I was Tahor, I already fulfilled my obligation to bring a burnt-offering; the current burnt-offering is a voluntary offering, and the other sacrifices I bring to complete the obligatory sacrifices of a Tahor Nazir.
(c) Objection (R. Yehoshua): (If he was Tahor,) he does not bring his obligatory sacrifices at one time!
1. Chachamim agreed to Ben Zoma.
(d) (Gemara) Question: So what if he does not bring his obligatory sacrifices at one time?!
(e) Answer (Rav Yehudah): Even R. Yehoshua admits, this is fine; he only said otherwise to sharpen his Talmidim and train them to ask questions.
(f) Question (Rav Nachman): According to R. Yehoshua, how do we prevent the Chelev from congealing until it can be offered on the Altar (after they finish shaving)?
Next daf

Index


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,
daf@shemayisrael.co.il