(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


POINT BY POINT SUMMARY

Prepared by Rabbi N. Slifkin
of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld


Ask A Question on the daf

Previous daf

Nedarim 64

1) GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT

(a) (Mishnah - R. Eliezer): We can prompt regret by suggesting that the vow is dishonors his parents; Chachamim forbid this;
1. R. Tzadok: Rather than suggest the dishonor to his parents - we should suggest the dishonor to Hash-m!
2. Chachamim: If so, there are no vows!
(b) Chachamim admit to R. Eliezer when the vow forbids his parents.
(c) R. Eliezer says, we can annul vows using Nolad (subsequent unexpected developments); Chachamim forbid this.
1. Reuven vowed not to get benefit from Ploni, and Ploni became the scribe of the town;
2. Or: Ploni was about to marry off his son (and Reuven wants to attend);
i. Reuven says, had I known that he would become the scribe, or marry off his son in the near future, I would not have vowed;
3. 'It is forbidden for me to enter this house', and it became a synagogue;
i. Had he known that it would become a synagogue, he would not have vowed;
4. R. Eliezer considers these grounds for annulment; Chachamim do not.
(d) (Gemara) Question: What does it mean, 'there are no vows'?
(e) Answer #1 (Abaye): If so, vows are not annulled properly;
64b---------------------------------------64b

(f) Answer #2 (Rava): If so, people will permit their own vows without going to a Chacham.
(g) (Mishnah): Chachamim admit to R. Eliezer when the vow forbids his parents.
1. We understand, according to Abaye - he initially wanted to anger his parents, and now he regrets this.
2. Question: According to Rava, here also, we should be concerned that people will permit their own vows without going to a Chacham!
3. Answer: Since people know that other vows can only be annulled by a Chacham, they will also go to a Chacham for this type of vow.
(h) (Mishnah): R. Eliezer says, we can annul vows using Nolad ...
(i) Question: What is R. Eliezer's reason?
(j) Answer (Rav Chisda): "For all the men have died ..." (and therefore Moshe can annul his vow) - and death is Nolad!
1. Chachamim argue, for they sat that they did not really die!
2. (R. Yochanan): Wherever the Torah speaks of men quarreling and standing, it refers to Dasan and Aviram;
3. (Reish Lakish): (Hash-m said that they died because) they became poor.
(k) (R. Yehoshua Ben Levi): Anyone without children is considered to be dead - "Give me children; if not, I am dead".
(l) (Beraisa): 4 people are considered as dead: a poor person; a leper; a blind person; and a childless person.
1. A poor person - "For all the men have died".
2. A leper - "Let not (Miryam) be as dead;
3. A blind person - "In darkness he sat me, as the dead";
(m) A childless person - "Give me children; if not, I am dead".
Next daf

Index


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,
daf@shemayisrael.co.il