Ask A Question about the Daf

Previous daf

Shabbos 118

1) THREE MEALS OR FOUR MEALS ON SHABBOS

QUESTION: The Gemara cites a Beraisa that states that one may wash dishes on Shabbos in preparation for a meal that is going to be eaten on Shabbos. Therefore, one may wash dishes after the Friday night meal for the Shabbos morning meal, after the Shabbos morning meal for the noon meal, after the noon meal for the afternoon meal. After the afternoon meal, however, he may not wash dishes, because no other meal is eaten on Shabbos.

Why does the Beraisa say that one may wash dishes after the noon meal for another meal later in the afternoon? Once one has eaten the noon meal, he has already eaten three meals on Shabbos, and the Rabanan rule that we eat only *three* meals on Shabbos (bottom of 117b). After the third meal, it should be forbidden to wash the dishes!

ANSWERS:

(a) The RASHBAM (in Hagahos on the Rif cited by the Dikdukei Sofrom, #20) and the ME'IRI explain that the author of this Beraisa was Rebbi Chidka, who maintains that one must eat *four* meals on Shabbos.

(b) The TOSFOS RID says that the Beraisa means that if a person *wants* and intends to eat a fourth meal, then he may wash the dishes after the third meal. Indeed, he may continue to wash the dishes for as many meals as he intends to eat on Shabbos; the Beraisa lists four only because that is the most a person commonly eats.

118b

QUESTION: The Gemara tells us that "if the Jewish people would observe two Shabbosos properly, they would immediately be redeemed." This is derived from the verses in Yeshayahu (56:4,7), "Thus says Hashem to the Sarisim (eunuchs) who observe My Shabbosos.... I will bring them to My holy mountain, and make them joyful in My house of prayer...."

Why does the verse specifically refer to "Sarisim?" Furthermore, why does the Gemara cite the earlier verse (v. 4), and not the verse (v. 6) which immediately precedes the promise of the redemption (v. 7), "All that guard My Shabbosos from profaning it... I will bring them to My holy mountain...?"

ANSWER: The MAHARSHA suggests an original interpretation of this Gemara. The Gemara in Nidah (38b) relates that there is a set range of lengths for the human gestation period. "Chasidim ha'Rishonim," who were aware that a pregnancy can only last 271, 272, or 273 days, abstained from their wives during the early part of the week in order to avoid conceiving a child that would be born on Shabbos, which would result in Chilul Shabbos.

The Maharsha suggests that the Gemara is hinting to us that if a husband abstains from his wife on particular days of the week (that is, he conducts himself like a *eunuch*) in order to avoid having a child born on Shabbos, he thereby prevents the desecration of two Shabbosos (the day when the child is born, and a week later when the child has his Bris Milah). Through his concern for the observance of Shabbos, he will merit the coming of the final redemption!

QUESTION: Rebbi Yosi prayed that his lot should be among those who say the complete psalm of Hallel every day. The Gemara asks that we have learned that a person who says Hallel ha'Gadol every day scorns and blasphemes. The Gemara answers that Rebbi Yosi was praying that he should be among those who say Pesukei d'Zimra every day, and not Hallel ha'Gadol. We see, then, that the psalms of Pesukei d'Zimra are good to say every day. Furthermore, the Gemara in Berachos (6b) states that one who says Tehilah l'David (Ashrei) three times each day is assured of a share in the World to Come.

What is the difference between the psalm of Hallel ha'Gadol and the psalms of Pesukei d'Zimra and Ashrei?

ANSWERS:

(a) The MAHARSHA says that the theme of Hallel ha'Gadol is to proclaim that Hashem wrought open miracles for his people. If one recites this psalm every day, even on days on which no open miracle occurred, then on days on which Hashem did cause a miracle to happen, the miracle will not be made evident through this person's recitation of Hallel ha'Gadol (since he says it every day). The other psalms, though, are general praises of Hashem which do not specifically praise Him for His miracles.

(b) The MESHECH CHACHMAH (beginning of Parshas Bechukosai) explains that the entire process of nature itself is a miracle. However, a person gets used to it and fails to give adequate praise to Hashem. The open miracles that Hashem performs serve to *remind a person* about the miracles inherent in the natural order of the world. This is the purpose of saying Hallel ha'Gadol on days on which Hashem performed open miracles. One who says Hallel ha'Gadol every day loses this reminder, and thinks that he must praise Hashem *only* for the open miracles.

On the other hand, Ashrei and the other psalms of Pesukei d'Zimra discuss how all of the parts of the natural world are governed by Hashem. By saying those psalms every day, a person praises Hashem for the subtle miracles of nature. The processes of nature are represented by the alphabetical composition of Ashrei since it progresses in a natural order, as does nature.

QUESTION: Rebbi Yosi proclaimed that in all of his days, he never acted against the words of his friends, to the extent that even if his friends were to tell him "to go up to the Duchan," he would, even though he was not a Kohen.

How could Rebbi Yosi, who was not a Kohen, go up to Duchan? The Gemara in Kesuvos (24b) states that it is an Isur Aseh (a prohibition resulting from a positive commandment) for a non-Kohen to bless the people!

ANSWERS:

(a) The REMA (OC 128:1) writes that the prohibition of the Gemara in Kesuvos refers only to when a non-Kohen blesses the people by himself. If he goes up with Kohanim, there is no prohibition. Rebbi Yosi was referring to when there were other Kohanim -- that is when he would go up to Duchan if his friends told him to do so.

(b) The HAFLA'AH in Kesuvos (24b) says the opposite. The Hafla'ah explains (as does the Sefer Charedim and the Ritva in Rosh Hashanah) that just like there is a Mitzvah for the Kohen to bless the people, there is a Mitzvah for the people to be blessed by the Kohen. Consequently, when there are Kohanim there to bless the people, a non-Kohen may not join them in blessing the people because he will thereby miss receiving the blessing from the Kohanim. However, when there are *no* Kohanim present to bless the people, he may go up to bless them, since he is not missing any blessing from Kohanim.

(c) The TORAH TEMIMAH (Parshas Pekudei) cites the introduction to the Sefer of RABEINU YERUCHAM, who quotes this Gemara with a variant rendition. In Rabeinu Yerucham's version, Rebbi Yosi said, "Even though I am not *K'dai* (worthy), I would go up to Duchan," and not "Even though I am not a *Kohen*..." which is the text in our Gemaras. According to this reading, Rebbi Yosi might not have been discussing the blessing of the Kohanim at all. Rather, he was discussing going up to the Duchan (platform) from which the public lecturer would teach the people, and that is why he said, "Even though I am not *worthy*."