Previous daf

1)

(a) What leads us to believe that, if the author of the Beraisa ('ha'Omer le'Ishah Harei At Mekudeshes Li le'Achar she'Esgayer ... ') is Rebbi Akiva, then in the last case there ('le'Achar she'Yachlotz Yevamech'), the Kidushin should be valid?

(b) The Tana Kama in the Mishnah in Nedarim states that if a woman says to her husband 'Konem she'Ani Osah le'Picha', Ein Tzarich Lehafer'.
Why is that?

(c) What does Rebbi Akiva say?

(d) We initially think that Rebbi Akiva must hold 'Adam Makneh Davar she'Lo Ba le'Olam', but then quote Rav Huna Brei de'Rav Yehoshua to refute that. What does Rav Huna Brei de'Rav Yehoshua say?

(a) Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak disagrees with Rav Huna Brei de'Rav Yehoshua. According to him, what do Rav Huna, Rav, Rebbi Yanai, Rebbi Chiya, Rebbi, Rebbi Meir, Rebbi Eliezer ben Ya'akov and Rebbi Akiva have in common? (b) What does Rav Huna say about someone who sells the fruit of a date-palm in winter, before it has grown?

(c) According to Rav Nachman, he can retract even in Nisan, after they have grown. What does he concede to Rav Huna?

(d) Rav Huna got this ruling from Rav.
What does he quote Rav as saying with regard to someone who sells a field before having purchased it himself?

(a) Rebbi Yanai learned this ruling from Rebbi Chiya, who gave his consent to what Rebbi Yanai once did with regard to a basket of fruit that he had not yet received.
What did he do?

(b) What did Rebbi Chiya learn from the Pasuk in Re'ei "Lema'an Tilmad le'Yir'ah es Hashem Kol ha'Yamim" (written in connection with Terumah and Ma'asros)? What does "Kol ha'Yamim" mean?

(c) Why can the Pasuk not be coming to permit the separation of Terumos and Ma'asros on Shabbos?

4)

(a) What led Rebbi Yanai to believe that he had done the wrong thing?

(b) Then how did Rebbi Chiya interpret 'Kanah Ratzutz'?

(a) Rebbi too, holds 'Adam Makneh Davar she'Lo Ba Le'olam'.
How does Rebbi explain the Pasuk in Ki Seitzei "Lo Sasgir Eved el Adonav"?

(b) And so do Rebbi Meir, Rebbi Eliezer ben Ya'akov and Rebbi Akiva.
What does ...

1. ... Rebbi Meir say in the Beraisa that we quoted on the previous Daf, following the statement of the Tana Kama 'ha'Omer le'Ishah Harei At Mekudeshes Li le'Achar she'Esgayer, le'Achar she'Tisgayri ... Einah Mekudeshes'?
2. ... Rebbi Eliezer ben Ya'akov say in a Beraisa about someone who designatesTerumah from detached fruit to cover fruit that is still attached or vice-versa?

(c) What do we learn from the Pasuk in Behar "ve'Asas es ha'Tevu'ah li'Sh'losh ha'Shanim"?

(a) They asked Rav Sheishes whether one witness is believed to permit a woman to perform Yibum. It is obvious that, if the reason of our Tana, who believes him with regard to allowing her to get married, is because a person does not lie in any matter which is destined to become public knowledge,, then the same will apply when it comes to allowing her to perform Yibum.
What is the other reason for the Tana believing one witness?

(b) Why might this reason not apply when it comes to allowing her to perform Yibum?

(c) Rav Sheishes replied with our Mishnah 'Amru Lah Meis B'neich ve'Achar-Kach Meis Ba'alech ve'Nisyabmah, ve'Achar-Kach Amru Lah ... '. Assuming that the Mishnah is apeaking about two witnesses who overrule the testimony of the one witness who came first, what does he infer from there? How does he resolve the She'eilah from there?

(d) How does he know that the Tana is not talking about a case when *two* witnesses came first (and not one)?

Next daf