rashihed.jpg (16002 bytes)

subscribe.gif (2332 bytes)


by Dr. Avigdor Bonchek


Back to This Week's Parsha | Previous Issues

Parashas Devarim

Tosephos questions Rashi's midrashic interpretation.

Deuteronomy 1:1

These are the words that Moses spoke to all of Israel across the Jordan, in the wildreness, on the Aravah plain opposite Suf, between Paran and Tofel and Lovon and Chatzeiros and Di Zahav.


These are the words: Rashi: Because these are words of reproof and [because] he (Moses) intended to recount here all the places where they angered the Almighty he therefore said these words in an obscure manner and only mentioned them in hints in respect for the honor of Israel.


A Question: Why does Rashi interpret these place names as symbolic terms for the sins of Israel? Why doesn't he accept them simply as actual places?

Hint: See the other Rashi-comments on this verse.

Your Answer:


An Answer: In his ensuing comments on this verse Rashi points out two difficulties with accepting these place-names at face value. First, he says "They were not in the Wilderness, they were in the Planes of Moab!" And further on in his comments Rashi cites Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai who says "We have reviewed all the Scriptures and have not found places whose names were Tofel or Lovon!" If these were among the places where Moses spoke to the People, why didn't the Torah mentioned them previously?

On the basis of these questions, Rashi searches for another interpretation of this verse. How does his interpretation help matters?

Your Answer:


An Answer: With Rashi's comment we are to read this verse as follows: These are the words [of rebuke] that Moses spoke to the Children of Israel on the other side of the Jordan: (then follows a recitation of place-names which hint at their various sins committed while they wandered in the Wilderness). Thus the place-names do not necessarily denote actual geographical locations. So, in fact, they were in the Planes of Moab (on the other side of the Jordan); they were not presently in the Wilderness. The place-name "wilderness" instead refers to the sin they did while in the wilderness, i.e. worshipping the Golden Calf.


Rashi tells us is that the reason the sins were only hinted at, and not mentioned explicitly, was out of respect for Israel, so as not to openly criticize and embarrass them.

Can you think of a question on this interpretation?

Hint: Look further on in the sedra.

Your Question:


The Moshav Zekanim, a compilation of comments by the Ba'alie Tosephos, asks the following question. If Moses was so respectful of their honor that he did not openly mention their previous sins, how come we find, not so much further on (1:27ff), that he openly castigates them for the sin of the Spies. And later on (9:15) he criticizes them quite harshly regarding the Golden Calf that they made. From these verses and others, it does not seem that Moses was overly sensitive to their honor. How can we say that his concern for their honor caused him to just hint at their sins in our verse?

The Moshav Zekanim does not offer any answer to this question and therefor says these place-names are in fact places.

Can you think of a defense for Rashi? Why would Moses only hint at their sins here, whereas later on he was most outspoken and direct?

Your Answer:


An Answer: A commentary on Rashi, Amar Nekai, which was written by Rabbi Ovadia of Bartenura, the famous commentator on the mishna, suggests a very reasonable answer to Tosephos' question. He says that because this is the very first verse in the Book of Devarim, Rashi understood that Moses would be extra sensitive to the Honor of the people. But further on, once Moses' oration began, he no longer felt the necessity to speak in hints. On the contrary, there it was important to speak clearly, so that his musar would be correctly understood.

Can you think of another place in the Torah where the idea of not beginning a new Book with criticism is found?

Your Answer:


An Answer: See Rashi on Bamidbar 9:1. There he explains that the Torah intentionally recorded events not in their chronological order so as not to begin the Book of Bamidbar with an event would reflect negatively on the People of Israel.

Shabbat Shalom
Avigdor Bonchek

We have good news to announce. The new Bamidbar volume of "What's Bothering Rashi?"is ready and should be in the bookstore soon. Look and ask for it.

"What's Bothering Rashi?" is a product of the "Institute for the Study of Rashi and the Early Torah Commentaries." 2 Wisconsin Circle, Chevy Chase MD 20815

Back to This Week's Parsha | Previous Issues

This article is provided as part of Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Permission is granted to redistribute electronically or on paper,
provided that this notice is included intact.

For information on subscriptions, archives, and
other Shema Yisrael
Classes, send mail to parsha@shemayisrael.co.il

Jerusalem, Israel