rashihed.jpg (16002 bytes)

subscribe.gif (2332 bytes)

 

by Dr. Avigdor Bonchek

Introduction

Back to This Week's Parsha | Previous Issues


Parashas Nitzavim/Vayelech (5762)

Rashi points out the significance of "today."

Deut. 29:14

"But with whoever is here, standing with us today before Hashem, our G-d, and whoever is not here with us today."

RASHI

And whoever is not here: Rashi: Even generations destined to be [born].

QUESTIONING RASHI

A Question: Rashi's comment seems somewhat far out. Why the need for the it? Why can't he understand these words simply, i.e. all those not present at this assembly? And how does someone make a covenant with someone not yet alive?

Hint: See the previous verses.

What's bothering Rashi?

Your Answer:

WHAT IS BOTHERING RASHI?

An Answer: The first verse in the sedra (29:9) says explicitly who were present at this assembly. They included "the heads of the tribes, your elders, your law officers, every man of Israel."

If every man of Israel was present, who could be meant by "those not present here today"?

This is what's bothering Rashi.

How does Rashi's comment deal with this?

Your Answer:

UNDERSTANDING RASHI

An Answer: "Those not here today" means "those not here today!" The emphasis is on "today," which implies those here at some other time - in the future.

But the question has been asked: How can an agreement be made with someone not yet born?

Can you answer this?

Your Answer:

A FULLER UNDERSTANDING

An Answer: From a legal point of view this may be difficult to justify. But from an historical or sociological perspective this is quite normal. Of all the possible legacies that parents could hand over to their children, religion is the most universal and most long lasting. Parents can pass on to their offspring any one of a number of allegiances - political, national, intellectual, social philosophical and others. But none is as common as transmitting one's religious affiliation to the next generation. Nor is any as binding as the religious commitment. Why this is so may be a mystery, but it remains a fact of human society. Rashi's comment reflects this phenomenon. The nation that stood at Sinai and the next generation who heard Moses' final oration in the land of Moav, accepted G-d's Covenant, thereby obligating themselves and all their future generations to its fulfillment.

"Today" - The SEVEN CODE

I have shown elsewhere ("Studying the Torah: A Guide to In-depth Interpretation") how the Torah emphasizes a theme by repeating a key word seven times within one parashah. The word "today" äéåí is repeated seven times in chapter 29, which delineates a parashah (from 29:9 - 28). (Interestingly enough, also chapter 30 has "today" repeated seven times.)What is the message? Obviously "today" was an important day for those present. It was the last day of Moses' life; it was a day that the covenant was made (renewed), the people were warned "today," and they were sustained "today" as G-d's nation. But in spite of the emphasis on today, even " those not here today" were also included in the ceremony and the commitment. And that may be because only if "today" has the seeds of future "todays" within it, does it have any lasting significance.

Shabbat Shalom
Avigdor Bonchek

What’s Bothering Rashi?” is produced by the “Institute for the Study of Rashi.” The Devarim volume of "What's Bothering Rashi?" is now out and should be at your Jewish bookstore. Ask for it. This volume features Rashi and the Ba'alie Tosafos.


Back to This Week's Parsha | Previous Issues


This article is provided as part of Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Permission is granted to redistribute electronically or on paper,
provided that this notice is included intact.

For information on subscriptions, archives, and
other Shema Yisrael
Classes, send mail to parsha@shemayisrael.co.il

http://www.shemayisrael.co.il
Jerusalem, Israel
732-370-3344