Rashi gives us a new insight into a well known verse.
After the sin of the Spies, Moses interceeds with Hashem to ask forgiveness for the people.
And Hashem said "I have forgiven, as you said."
As you said. RASHI: Because of what you (Moses) said 'lest they say: Hashem lacked the ability' (see above 14:16).
A Question: Isn't the verse's meaning clear enough? G-d said He will forgive, as Moses had requested. Why the need to comment here?
Another question: Moses said several things in his plea for forgiveness, (verses 13-19), why does Rashi quote just this one phrase from Moses' plea ?
What's bothering him?
What Is Bothering Rashi?
An Answer: Hashem said that He was forgiving the people. But if this were so, why does He then say (verses 23..28) "If they will see the Land that I have sworn to give to their forefathers, and all who anger Me shall not see it. ….Say to them, as I live, by the word of Hashem , if I shall not do to you as you have spoken in My ears. In this wilderness shall your carcasses drop …" Punishing the people is in direct contradiction to G-d's saying He forgives them.
Can you see how Rashi's comment deals with this problem?
An Answer: Rashi has chosen these particular words in Moses' plea precisely to answer this question. Moses made two main points in his plea to G-d.
1) If the Israelites are destroyed by G-d and do not enter the Promised Land, then the gentiles will conclude that Hashem was incapable of fulfilling His promise to the Forefathers regarding the Land of Israel. This would be a Chilul Hashem - a desecration of G-d's name.
2) Moses appealed to G-d's mercy, as well, by paraphrasing the special prayer which Hashem had taught Moses after the sin of the Golden Calf ( see Exodus 34:6) On that basis, he asked G-d to forgive the people their sin.
Rashi is telling us that when G-d said "I have forgiven" He does not mean a complete forgiveness, He means, rather, a qualified forgiveness, a forgiveness based on and limited to "your words." This means that G-d forgave only in accordance with that part of Moses' plea that referred to the Chilul Hashem which would result if G-d didn't bring the people Israel into the Land of Canaan. G-d's forgiveness relates to the fact that, in spite of their sin, the nation of Israel - the next generation - will be brought by G-d into the Promised Land, thus there will be no Chilul Hashem. On the other hand, this generation will be killed out. For this generation there is to be no forgiveness. Clearly the forgiveness was partial.
(See Ohr Hachayim)
But according to this understanding, we can ask another question of Rashi's interpretation. G-d said he would forgive "as your (Moses') words." But Moses' plea included other words in addition to the ones Rashi quotes. Why didn't Rashi also consider Moses' words "And now may the power of My Lord etc." (14:17) as "your words" כדברך ? Why doesn't Rashi quote these words as well?
Hint: Read these verses carefully.
A Closer Look: The Precision in the Torah's Words
An Answer: In light of Rashi's sensitive interpretation, we can understand the precision of the Torah's words. As we pointed out, Moses' plea had two parts to it. The second part, the explicit plea for forgiveness was based on G-d's own words (in Exodus 34:6). Moses says in verse 14:17:
"And now let your strength wax great My Lord, as you spoke saying : 'Hashem, slow to anger etc.' "
Notice, that although Moses said these words, they were not his own words, they were a paraphrase of G-d's words. In light of this we can appreciate that only the original words of Moses' plea were the words that Rashi quotes. It is as if G-d is saying: "I have forgiven, as YOUR words, but not as My words," which, had I done so, would have meant a complete forgiveness!.
(See Nachlas Ya'akov)
The Moral Lesson
G-d had accepted Moses' plea for forgiveness, but only to a certain degree. On the one hand, He consented to have the next generation of People of Israel enter the Land of Canaan, as He had promised the Forefathers. Nevertheless, He exacted punishment from the generation that sinned. We have here neither a sweeping amnesty nor a wholesale punishment.
This is G-d's morality. The Psalmist says (25:8):
"Good and upright is G-d therefore He guides sinners on the [right] way."
On these words the midrash adds a pithy insight.
"Why is He good? Because He is upright. Why is He upright? Because He is good."
An artfully succinct phrase which teaches us G-d's balance in judgement. If He were always good, then His goodness would lose all value. It is similar to a person who always has a smile on his face; the smile loses all significance. So the good, in order to retain its quality of goodness, must be tempered, at times, with righteousness. Likewise, righteousness, for it to remain righteous and not deteriorate into the callous, cold, impersonal implementation of the law, it too must so be tempered at times with a touch of goodness.
G-d maintains this sensitive balance in rendering judgment. Likewise in our case, while the Spies were punished, there was no collective punishment and the future generations did not suffer for the sins of their fathers.
Rashi's simple but laden-with-meaning comment highlights the precision of the Torah's words. In so doing he also provides us with a perspective on Divine morality. With a few words, Rashi has treated us to a deeper dimension of understanding.
We have good news to announce. The new Bamidbar volume of "What's Bothering Rashi?"is ready and should be in the bookstore soon. Look and ask for it.
"What's Bothering Rashi?" is a product of the "Institute for the Study of Rashi and the Early Torah Commentaries." 2 Wisconsin Circle, Chevy Chase MD 20815
Back to This Week's Parsha | Previous Issues
This article is provided as part of Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Permission is granted to redistribute electronically or on paper,
provided that this notice is included intact.
For information on subscriptions, archives, and
other Shema Yisrael
Classes, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org