|
When the meeting (or more accurately, the tirade) was over the man pointed to a different exit and told them to go out that way. They opened the door only to find that the exit was through a warehouse! On the way they passed a desk and were stopped by a secretary who it seems was told to give them a check (needless to say she should have been instructed to bring the check into the office). She didnt offer them a chair (instead Rabbi Weissberg brought one for the Rosh Yeshiva) and altogether treated them shabbily (obviously getting the message from her employer) and wrote them a small check -- making sure they continue out through the warehouse (rather than back through the office where they would again meet the boss). Rabbi Weissberg could hardly restrain himself over the atrocious treatment accorded the Godol Hador and implored the Rosh Yeshiva to not dignify the mans behavior by accepting his check, which in any case was nowhere near the amount they came for. The Rosh Yeshiva refused, explaining that whatever they do will reflect on Telze which arranged the meeting in the first place. The check was duly accepted. Rabbi Weissberg adds that the Rosh Yeshiva never reacted to a personal insult at all! Kvod Hashem and Chillul Hashem elicited a very strong reaction from him but if the bizayon was personal, he was quiet. Regarding some of the Rosh Yeshivas own thoughts on tolerating and even accepting difficulties and bizyonos in his efforts to raise funds for Torah we have the following from Reb Amos Bunim, as heard from him directly and as written in his book A fire in his Soul (section entitled Rabbi Aaron Kotler His Sterling Qualities pp. 197-8).
[These are just a few stories. Bizyonos, and hardship, especially when it came to fund raising, were daily fare for the Rosh Yeshiva (as they were for the Rosh Yeshiva Rav Schneur zt'l). He dealt with all kinds of people, yes, most appreciated him, some understood him, many didnt understand him and he suffered often from it. It is a sign of his greatness that he accepted it all so willingly, a sign of his great Emunoh in Torah, in every word of chazal, in Tachlis Hachayim - lifes purpose; it was a sign of his love of Hashem, love of Torah, love of Bnei Torah, love of Klal Yisroel - his love and overriding concern. It was a sign of his inner strength, his Gvuroh, that he was so ready to endure for Torah and to endure willingly (as above). The Rosh Yeshiva would often quote in this context Thillim (119): Tov Li Ki Unaisi Lmaan Elmad Chukechoh, and Rashi there who explains: It was good in my eyes that I endured suffering in order to learn your laws - when I learned Torah with pain (which undoubtedly applies to teaching and supporting Torah also). It was a sign of his overriding sense of responsibility, his sense of mission - his Shlichus to bring Torah to these shores. [The Mashgiach of Lakewood, Rav Noson Wachtfogel once made an absolutely amazing observation in this context. He said (in a shmuess) that the Rosh Yeshiva [almost?] never spoke about Kletzk when in America! Of course he loved and remembered Kletzk well; of course he cried in his heart over his talmidim who perished, but right now he had to devote himself to his mission; he had to build the present and the future; he was a Shliach!] And of course, as above, enduring frequent bizyonos with equanimity was a sign of his great level of the Midoh of Savlonus. However a point must be made. Yes enduring difficulties is a sign of greatness and yes the Rosh Yeshiva undoubtedly ruled that it was part and parcel of his responsibility to build Torah. Building and upholding Torah is a responsibility that our Torah leaders have accepted throughout the ages - no matter what it entails; it is a responsibility laid on their shoulders Min Hashomayim. . . |