(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


POINT BY POINT SUMMARY

Prepared by P. Feldman
of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld


Ask A Question on the daf

Previous daf

Nedarim 28

1) FALSE VOWS

(a) (Mishnah): Beis Shamai say, one may falsely vow, but not swear; Beis Hillel say, one may even swear;
(b) Beis Shamai say, one may only vow if requested; Beis Hillel say, one may himself offer to vow;
(c) Beis Shamai say, one may only vow as requested; Beis Hillel say, one may increase on the vow.
1. The robber asked Reuven to vow, 'If I am lying, my wife should be forbidden to benefit from me'; Reuven vowed 'If I am lying, my wife and children should be forbidden'.
2. Beis Shamai say, his wife is permitted, his children are forbidden; Beis Hillel say, both are permitted.
(d) (Gemara) Question: But Shmuel said, the laws of the country must be followed!
(e) Answer #1 (Rav Chinena citing Shmuel): The tax collector in the Mishnah takes as much as he wants.
(f) Answer #2 (d'Vei R. Yanai): The tax collector was self-appointed (i.e. not by the king).
(g) (Mishnah): One may falsely vow that the property belongs to the king.
(h) Question: What vow does he say?
(i) Answer (Rav Amram): '(All) fruits should be forbidden to me if this is not the king's'.
(j) Question: If so, they indeed become forbidden to him!
(k) Answer: He says, '(All) fruits should be forbidden to me today if this is not the king's'.
(l) Objection: The tax collector will not accept such a vow!
(m) Answer: He only says 'today' in his heart, not with his lips.
1. Even though unspoken conditions are ignored, in the case of Ones they are valid.
(n) (Mishnah): Beis Shamai say, one may vow (but not swear)... only as requested; Beis Hillel say, one may increase on the vow;
1. He asked Reuven to vow, 'If I am lying, my wife should be forbidden to benefit from me'; Reuven vowed 'If I am lying, my wife and children should be forbidden'.
2. Beis Shamai say, his wife is permitted, his children are forbidden; Beis Hillel say, both are permitted.
(o) (Beraisa): Beis Shamai say, one may not open to him with an oath (i.e. without being asked); Beis Hillel say, he may open.
(p) Question #1: We infer, Beis Shamai do not allow offering to swear - but one may offer to vow!
1. In the Mishnah, Beis Shamai forbid this!
(q) Question #2: We infer, Beis Shamai do not allow offering to swear - but one may swear if requested!
1. In the Mishnah, Beis Shamai forbid this!
(r) Answer #1 (To both questions): The Tana of the Mishnah taught the argument by (offering to) vow, to show how stringent Beis Shamai are; the Tana of the Beraisa taught the argument by (offering to) swear, to show how lenient Beis Hillel are.
(s) Answer #2 (Rav Ashi): (The Beraisa has nothing to do with swearing to tax collectors;) Beis Shamai say, we do not open (annul) oaths; Beis Hillel say, we do.
2) IRREDEEMABLE HEKDESH
(a) (Mishnah): These saplings should be Hekdesh if they are not uprooted; this Talis should be Hekdesh if it is not burned - they may be redeemed;
(b) These saplings should be Hekdesh until they are uprooted; this Talis should be Hekdesh until it is burned - they may not be redeemed.
28b---------------------------------------28b

(c) (Gemara) Question: The Mishnah should say directly, they are Hekdesh (and not that they may be redeemed)!
(d) Answer: Since the end of the Mishnah must teach, 'They may not be redeemed', the beginning of the Mishnah said 'They may be redeemed'.
(e) Question: What was his vow?
(f) Answer (Ameimar): 'If they are not uprooted today', and they were not uprooted that day.
(g) Objection: This is obvious!
(h) Answer: The case is, there was a strong wind (and they were standing to be uprooted).
(i) Objection: But in the case of the Talis - is it really standing to be burned?!
(j) Answer: Yes! The case is, there is a fire.
1. One might have thought, he is only vowing because he thinks they will not be saved.
2. We hear, this is not so - he wants to make them Hekdesh if they are saved.
(k) (Mishnah): These saplings are Hekdesh ...
(l) Question: Are they always Hekdesh (why can't they be redeemed)?!
(m) Answer #1 (Bar Pada): The Mishnah teaches, no matter how many times they are redeemed before they are uprooted they become Hekdesh again;
1. Once uprooted, if they are redeemed, they become Chulin.
(n) Answer #2 (Ula): Once they are cut, there is no need to redeem them (they are automatically Chulin).
Next daf

Index


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,
daf@shemayisrael.co.il